Our correspondent recalls that INEC had declared that PDP candidate scored 105,720 votes to defeat the APC candidate who garnered 92,217 votes.
DAILY POST gathered that the Election Petition Tribunal recently affirmed the victory of Balogun as the winner of the election.
Dissatisfied with the judgment, Ajimobi and his political party, All Progressives Congress (APC), approached the Appeal Court asking that the victory of Balogun of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) be quashed on grounds including non-qualification for the election and that the election results declared by the electoral body was invalid.
The appellants led by Chief Akin Olujinmi (SAN) had claimed that the election tribunal did not properly evaluate the evidence brought before it before delivering judgment in the petition. The respondents led by Mr Olalekan Ojo (SAN), however, claimed that the tribunal through due diligence examined all evidence tendered before it.
Justice Haruna Samani, who delivered the judgment on behalf of the two other Justices (Okoronkwo and Ojo), who were not present, said that going by section 138 (1) (a), once the INEC has decided that a candidate has been validly nominated by the party, the issue of non-qualification would not arise.
“The issue cannot be raised now. It is certainly settled that the ground for disqualification for nomination is a matter for the Constitution. Anyone who is not an interested party will be considered an interloper. Once a candidate is nominated by a party, he cannot be disqualified by any other party.”
On the issue of the tribunal not given any probative value to the evidence of the appellant’s witnesses as canvassed by the petitioners, the Appeal Court Justice found that all the witnesses presented were not qualified to testify at the tribunal. They were not polling agents but only collation agents. They did not have any credible evidence before the tribunal and that was why their case failed.
“The appellants failed to adduce reasons why the collation agents could not give evidence before the tribunal. All the oral evidence given by the witnesses were rightly discountenanced by the tribunal, I do hold.”
Samani said that, “This appeal has no merit and so it is hereby dismissed. The judgment of the National Assembly Election Tribunal is hereby affirmed.”
Counsel to Balogun, Olumuyiwa Makinde, while reacting, commended the Justices for the well delivered judgment.
Balogun in his own reaction remarked that, “First and foremost, we have to give thanks to Almighty God because what has happened, to me and to the opposition camp, is not by anybody’s making but the grace of God. I thank people of my constituency, people of Oyo State and indeed people of Nigeria for their steadfastness in prayers and support. It is again an opportunity for me to continue to fulfil my pledge to the people of my senatorial district and to let them know that I will not disappoint them.
“This judgement is a judgment that is consistent with the decision of the Election Tribunal. It is devoid of any logical contradictions. It has been maximally delivered with the maximum fear of God.
“Senator Abiola Ajimobi is my brother and my friend. We shall continue to relate with ourselves. It is his right to do what he did and I cant fault him for taking that decision. The only thing I hear people say sometimes is that it is unwise to get in combatant mission with the grace of God and the will of the people. Once you do that, the result is obvious. So, to me, since this is the final stage of this election petition case, everybody will see that if God says yes, nobody can say no.”
