Not Less than 48,000 disengaged staff of Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) have engaged the services of an Abuja law firm to press home their retirement benefits from the Bureau for Public Enterprise (BPE).
Hassan Gar, the National Chairman of the ex-PHCN workers, told journalists in Bauchi on Sunday that they engaged the services of Emmanuel Okere law firm to pursue their entitlements.
He said since their disengagement from PHCN across the country six years ago following the company’s privatization, the over 48,000 staff were not paid their entitlements by the BPE.
“We have gone through stakeholders, national assembly, traditional leaders, and federal ministry of finance to demand our entitlements but could not yield any result that is why we sought the services of law firm in Abuja to pursue our entitlements.
“So what we are doing is not verification but authorization for the law firm to have the authority from the disengaged staff to collect their entitlements from BPE.
“The law firm said we must produce authorization form and a sworn affidavit from court to give him the go-ahead to pursue the entitlements and that is what we are doing contrary to verification exercise,” he said.
Mr. Gar said the N1,000 being contributed was for logistics and facilitation fees for the legal action being taken against the BPE, pointing out that the PHCN trade union and other relevant stakeholders had failed to fight for them.
The chairman said the forum was not conducting any verification but was collecting signatures of the affected former workers of the company to enable them to authorize the law firm to fight for their rights.
He explained that since their sack, they never collected any benefit, including 7.5 percent of federal government contribution of their pensions, arrears for personal/individual contributions for 16 months, 10 per cent equity share ‘as required by law’ and pre-retirement training allowances.
The leader of the disengaged workers appealed to the federal government to sympathize with them and address their plight by paying their entitlements.
Bank customers start payment of charges for deposits, withdrawal of cash
The objective of the “transaction fees” is to give vent to the Central Bank’s policy designed to reduce cash in use.
CBN Payments System Management Department Director Sam Okojere on Tuesday announced the take-off of the charges in a statement.
“The transactions will attract three per cent processing fees for withdrawals and two per cent processing fees for lodgments above N500, 000 for individual accounts.
“Corporate accounts will attract five per cent processing fees for withdrawals and three per cent processing fee for lodgments above N3 million.
“The charges will, however, only apply in Lagos, Ogun, Kano, Abia, Anambra, Rivers and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT),” he said.
Okojere said the implementation of the cash-less policy nationwide would take effect from March 31, 2020.
Also to further promote the cashless economy and to enhance the collection of applicable government revenues, the CBN announced a review of the process for merchant settlement.
The regulator has, effective today, approved for banks to unbundle merchant settlement amounts and charge applicable taxes and duties on individual transactions as stipulated by regulations.
Okojere announced a downward review of the Merchant Service Charge (MSC) from 0.75 per cent capped at N1,200 to 0.50 per cent capped at N1,000.
“The cash-less policy provides safe and efficient mechanisms for making and receiving payments with minimum risks to the CBN, payment service providers and end-users.
“The cashless payment is catching on to the extent that even the lowly members of the society now do transactions online.
“Without this policy, Nigeria cannot be integrated into the world’s financial system,” the statement read.
Pushing for the full use of the online payment system, the apex bank said for Nigeria to actively play at the world stage, “our payment system must be successfully benchmarked against the global best practices, as in most developed nations of the world.”
The Americans will see attack on Saudi oil as an attack on them
Its size and production capacity makes it a critical part of the global oil supply industry.
It’s not yet clear how much damage was caused to the two plants or for how long production will be impacted, but the Saudi oil minister confirmed overnight a temporary loss of 5.7 million barrels per day of production because of the attacks.
For context, Saudi Arabia pumped 9.8 million barrels per day in August.
The Abqaiq plant was the target of a failed al Qaeda attack in 2006. Since then it has been heavily fortified but is still vulnerable from the air, especially from drones which can bypass air defence systems.
In terms of the impact on the global market and oil supply: well, short term there may be a problem which will become clear when the markets open on Monday morning.
But longer term the gap will probably be bridged by increasing production elsewhere and by releasing reserves into the market.
The much bigger concern now is the geopolitical fallout and the consequence for regional security.
The US government is in no doubt that the Saudi drone attacks were the work of Iran.
The operation was claimed by the Yemeni Houthi rebel group but they are known to get weapons and technology from their main backer, Iran, who are suspected by other nations to use relatively low-tech ‘attack drones’ as weapons.
With cheap new technologies, small attack or ‘kamikaze’ drones are proving to be disproportionately effective when successful.
Two weeks ago, Israel carried out what they said was a preemptive strike on fighters they said were linked to Iran’s elite Quds Force who were preparing to launch a drone from Syria (where Iran now has a strong foothold) to attack Israel.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Tehran had launched an “unprecedented attack on the world’s oil supply”, adding that there was “no evidence that the drones were launched from Yemen”.
It’s true that, geographically, the two oil refineries are closer to Iran and Iraq (where Iran has a foothold) than to Yemen.
The Americans have always blamed Iran for stoking the flames of the Yemen conflict. But the drone attack represents, in US government eyes, an attack on global energy supply which they’ll interpret as an attack on them.
“We call on all nations to publicly and unequivocally condemn Iran’s attacks,” Mr Pompeo tweeted. “The United States will work with our partners and allies to ensure that energy markets remain well supplied and Iran is held accountable for its aggression.”
In such a chaotic and delicate region, an attack of this type is very dangerous.
Donald Trump has been hoping to meet Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in his latest attempt at rapprochement (after limited success with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un and no success with Afghanistan’s Taliban).
Last week he fired his national security adviser John Bolton who was calling for a much harder line on Iran.
While Mr Bolton sits out of office no doubt saying “I told you so”, President Trump must now be pondering the merits of the proposed meeting with the Iranian president.
His own secretary of state seems clear: “Tehran is behind nearly 100 attacks on Saudi Arabia while Rouhani and Zarif pretend to engage in diplomacy…”
Vat Increase: Businesses In Lagos To Pay 12.2 Per Cent On Goods, Services
Businesses in Lagos will pay 12.2 per cent on the sale of goods and services once the 7.2 per cent Value Added Tax increase comes into force.
An analyst with Afrinvest, Adedayo Bakare, pointed this to SaharaReporters on Wednesday during a chat.
The Lagos State Government had since collected tax from restaurants and other retailers under a sales tax law despite a Supreme Court ruling against such in September 2018.
Bakare while speaking with SaharaReporters, said, “In Lagos, consumption tax is already 10 per cent because Lagos State charges five per cent VAT and there is also another consumption tax of five per cent.
“So, for Lagos State, automatically, consumption tax is 12.2 per cent.”
Citing the data on VAT collection given by Nigeria’s former Finance Minister, Kemi Adeosun, in 2018, Bakare said only about four states were generating most of the VAT, adding that the tax burden on just a few is disproportionate.
“Meanwhile, when they generate all these money, they will share it between 36 states when most of the money is generated in just four states.”
While admitting that the hike in VAT was not wrong, Bakare said there was a more urgent need to keep widening the tax net.
He added, “It is important that they widen the tax net to bring more informal businesses to the formal sector.”
Crime2 days ago
An yi zanga-zanga kan rashin hukunta masu fyade yadda ya dace
Arewa1 day ago
$9.6bn fine: We don’t know persons Malami, EFCC arraigned in Nigeria – P&ID mocks Buhari govt
Buhari3 days ago
New economic team: What Buhari has done to Osinbajo – Fani-Kayode
News1 day ago
What Yemi Esan said after replacing Oyo-Ita
Hausa2 days ago
Champions League: Ansu Fati ya kafa tarihi a Barcelona
Crime3 days ago
Alleged N400m Theft: Ex-Army GOC Rejects Adeosun As Court Marshal President
News2 days ago
2023: Balarabe Musa, Tanko Yakassai reveal region to produce Buhari’s successor
Arewa3 days ago
Details of Buhari’s meeting with Police Service Commission emerge