The protesting drivers who were workers with the Transport Company of Anambra State, TRACAS numbering over 100 had staged a protest against the management of the company and by extension the state government over what they described as their unfair attitudes towards them.
The driver stopped passengers from boarding government-owned vehicles to Abuja and Lagos, forcing most passengers to return home for the day and not travelling to meet their engagements.
But speaking for the state government, the Managing Director of the company, Mrs Ifeoma Madukasi pleaded with travelers who were bullied by the protesting drivers, saying that it was not the habit of the transport company to be so unruly, but stating that the drivers were infiltrated by some elements who sought to control the company because they owned vehicles in the fleet.
“Most of those people you saw are LV drivers. LV means leasing vehicles, and what it means is that the vehicles do not belong to TRACAS, but they are running under our cover. These set of drivers are very troublesome, and would not allow new policies in the company.
“Most of them have expired vehicle papers, but when you ask them to go and renew, they see it as an attack. Those were part of the reasons for the protest you saw yesterday(Wednesday). We apologize to our passengers who were stopped from boarding vehicles to meet important engagements by these unruly drivers. Governor Obiano is looking into it, and it won’t happen again.”
Easter: FAAN assures Nigerians of safety
FAAN gave the assurance in a statement signed by its General Manager, Corporate Affairs, Mrs Henrietta Yakubu, in Lagos on Wednesday, NAN reports.
Yakubu noted that all necessary facilities, infrastructure and manpower had been deployed to ensure seamless facilitation at the airports.
She added that the relevant security agencies had been mobilised to beef up security at all airports during the period.
Yakubu also advised intending travelers to endeavour to leave for the airport early enough, so as to ensure that check-in formalities are conducted in good time.
Court takes decision on sale of 9mobile
NAN reports that the court, Presided over by Justice CJ Aneke, in a ruling on the preliminary objections filed by counsel to EMTS, upheld that the defendant’s prayers in Suit No. FHC/L/CS/153/2018 that there was no direct shareholding relationship between Spectrum Wireless and EMTS, thereby vesting on Spectrum the right to sue EMTS to protect its alleged shareholding in EMTS.
The Court also upheld the defendant’s position that there was no privity of contract between EMTS and Spectrum as Spectrum was not a shareholder in EMTS and could not be said to have been directly affected by the actions of its shareholders – Mubadala Holdings Cyprus Ltd, Myacynth and Etisalat International Nigeria Ltd.
The court further upheld the defendant’s position that if at Spectrum had a right of action, its action should be against PTHNV, the company it originally invested in and not EMTS.
The court, therefore, upheld the submission of counsel to EMTS that not being a shareholder of EMTS, Spectrum lacked the locus standi to bring the suit against EMTS on the basis of any decision taken by the shareholders of EMTS.
The court, therefore, upheld the defendant’s prayers saying that Spectrum lacked the locus standi to sue, adding that the concept of “indirect shareholding/economic interest” claimed by Spectrum was unknown to Nigerian law, which only recognized members of a company as those named in its Register of Members.
Justice Aneke also held that Spectrum is not a party to the credit facilities which it claimed were unlawfully obtained, and its elementary law that only parties to a contract can make judicial claims in respect thereof.
The court, therefore, dismissed the suit in its entirety.
In his reaction to the ruling, the Company Secretary/Legal Adviser, 9mobile, Ore Olajide, said “this was victory for democracy, victory for the rule of law in Nigeria, victory for company law, victory for legal practitioners, victory for corporate lawyers, academia and students of law.
“9mobile will continue to focus on satisfying our numerous customers and stakeholders who have faith in us and have stayed the course with us”.
It is recalled that Spectrum Wireless Communications sued EMTS and 16 other defendants including United Capital Trustees Limited (‘the Lenders’), the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) over the sale of the telco.
The company claimed that it acquired indirect holding of 30 per cent of the shares of EMTS after a private placement and was allotted 4,041,096 Class A shares of Premium Telecommunications Holdings NV (“PTHNV”) which owns 99% of the shares in MyaCynth Coperative UA (“MyaCynth”).
The plaintiff also claimed that MyaCynth holds 30 per cent of the shares of EMTS BV
and EMTS BV, holds 99.9 per cent of the shares of EMTS and that EMTS’ syndicated loan from the 2nd to 4th defendant’s and was granted without the requisite statutory approval of the CBN, and can, therefore, not be enforced through the sale of EMTS’ shares and assets by the 2nd to the 14th defendants.
Spectrum also claimed that its investments in EMTS would be lost if 15th to 17th defendants were allowed to effect the sale of EMTS.
FG moves to have Innoson boss arrested
They were charged in a fraud case before Justice Ayokunle Faji.
The Police had earlier charged them with an alleged N2.4billion shipping fraud, but the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), later took over the case.
Others named in the charge are Charles Chukwuma, Maximian Chukwura, Mitsui Osk Lines and Anajekwu Sunny.
The prosecution is praying the court to order the arrest of Innoson Motors Chairman and his staff for failing to turn up to take their plea in the criminal charge.
On Monday, Chukwuma and his staff were absent in court.
Prosecuting Counsel Mr. Julius Ajakaiye moved an application urging the court to order the absent defendants’ arrested.
He said the charge was served on them through a court-ordered February 8, 2016 substituted service following the AGF’s take-over of the case.
Consequently, he said the defendants were yet to take their plea and should therefore be compelled to appear.
He added that an April 12, 2016 amended charge could not be served on the absent defendants.
Ajakaiye urged the court to grant his application by ordering their arrest.
But defence counsel Chief George Uwechue (SAN) and Prof. C. Mbadugha prayed the court to dismiss the application.
They argued that the court lacked jurisdiction to issue the warrant against the defendants “because they were not properly summoned before the court”.
They said the application offends Order 6 of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rules, adding that there was no proper service on their clients.
Justice Faji adjourned until July 3 for ruling.
Hausa3 days ago
Shin an samar da tsaro a hanyar Abuja zuwa Kaduna? – BBC Hausa
Crime3 days ago
REVEALED: Full Names Of The 23 Nigerians To Be Executed In Saudi Arabia
News3 days ago
Presidential election: How Atiku planned to destabilise Nigeria through Onnoghen – Buhari’s aide
Law2 days ago
Delta CJ frees prison inmate who allegedly stole banana
Hausa2 days ago
Yadda Rikicin Boko Haram Ya Shafi Harkokin Kasuwanci
Hausa2 days ago
Zamfara: Shin kashe-kashen gilla karuwa yake a Najeriya?
News2 days ago
EPL: Highest goalscorers in the Premier League after Week 34 [See top 20]
Arewa3 days ago
Boko Haram kills seven soldiers in Chad